Request for Authorization (RFA)
View Other Articles

Saunders v. Loma Linda Univ. Med. Group (6/10/15)

Last update
May 15, 2024

WCAB Split Panel Opinion

Stacey Saunders v. Loma Linda University Medical Group (Jun 10, 2015)


In rescinding its prior decision (Saunders v. Loma Linda Univ. Med. Group, 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 659), the majority panel held that, as with an untimely utilization review (UR) decision, an untimely Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination is invalid and that therefore the Workers’ Compensation Judge can decide medical treatment. The Appeals Board relied on Labor Code § 4610.6(d) and Dubon II. Commissioner Zalewski dissented, reasoning that “the Legislature intended to make IMR the exclusive process for determining a medical treatment dispute that is not finally resolved by UR...”

Additional Information

California Labor Code § 4610.6

DaisyBill Resources

Blog: Your Request for Authorization (RFA) Questions Answered
WCAB Emphasizes UR Decisions

DaisyBill Solution

DaisyBill’s easy billing software guarantees that RFAs are always submitted compliantly. For more information about California’s workers’ comp electronic billing, book a demo and see how easily DaisyBill solves workers' comp billing problems.


How did you like the article ?
Hands down the best way to quickly determine up-to-date reimbursements and past dates of service.
Start Free Trial