Saunders v. Loma Linda University Medical Group (6/10/15)

WCAB Split Panel Opinion

Stacey Saunders v. Loma Linda University Medical Group (Jun 10, 2015)


In rescinding its prior decision (Saunders v. Loma Linda Univ. Med. Group, 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 659), the majority panel held that, as with an untimely utilization review (UR) decision, an untimely Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination is invalid and that therefore the Workers’ Compensation Judge can decide medical treatment. The Appeals Board relied on Labor Code § 4610.6(d) and Dubon II. Commissioner Zalewski dissented, reasoning that “the Legislature intended to make IMR the exclusive process for determining a medical treatment dispute that is not finally resolved by UR...”

Additional Information

California Labor Code § 4610.6

DaisyBill Resources

Blog: Your Request for Authorization (RFA) Questions Answered
WCAB Emphasizes UR Decisions

DaisyBill Solution

DaisyBill’s easy billing software guarantees that RFAs are always submitted compliantly. For more information about California’s workers’ comp electronic billing, book a demo and see how easily DaisyBill solves workers' comp billing problems.


Was this article helpful?

About Us

DaisyBill is a trusted authority on workers’ comp billing. Thousands of work comp professionals attend our webinars and state agencies and professional organizations turn to us for our expertise. We created this blog to help everyone involved in workers’ compensation; sharing news, tips, and data of interest to the community.

Drop us a line with any news you would like us to share or any issue that concerns you.

Read more

Search results for: