Frequently Asked Questions
Dubon v. World Restoration II (10/6/2014)
WCAB 2014 En Banc Decision
Jose Dubon v. World Restoration, Inc.; and State Compensation Insurance Fund (Oct. 6, 2014)
- Case No: ADJ4274323 (ANA 0387677) - ADJ1601669 (ANA 0388466)
- 79 Cal. Comp. Cases 1298
After granting reconsideration of its prior en banc decision in order to further review and study the issues, the Appeals Board issued its decision after reconsideration wherein it rescinded its en banc decision of February 27, 2014, affirmed the workers’ compensation administrative law judge’s decision, which determined that the medical necessity of applicant’s requested back surgery must be determined by independent medical review (IMR), notwithstanding any procedural defects in defendant’s timely utilization review (UR) decision, and held as follows:
- A UR decision is invalid and not subject to independent medical review (IMR) only if it is untimely;
- Legal issues regarding the timeliness of a UR decision must be resolved by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), not IMR;
- All other disputes regarding a UR decision must be resolved by IMR;
- If a UR decision is untimely, the determination of medical necessity may be made by the WCAB based on substantial medical evidence consistent with Labor Code section 4604.5.
Note: Frequently referred to as Dubon II.
DaisyBill’s easy billing software guarantees that RFAs are always submitted compliantly. For more information about California’s workers’ comp electronic billing, book a demo and see how easily DaisyBill solves workers' comp billing problems.
Was this article helpful?
DaisyBill is a trusted authority on workers’ comp billing. Thousands of work comp professionals attend our webinars and state agencies and professional organizations turn to us for our expertise. We created this blog to help everyone involved in workers’ compensation; sharing news, tips, and data of interest to the community.
Drop us a line with any news you would like us to share or any issue that concerns you.